Uncategorized files

Showing below up to 50 results in range #101 to #150.

• 
  FIGURE 5-58. Nomenclature for Parachute Inflation Sequence..jpg 519 × 373; 39 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-59. Opening Forces of Various Personnel Parachutes Tested at Altitudes from 7000 to 40,000 Feet at a Terminal Velocity of 102 KEAS..jpg 483 × 439; 32 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-6. Seventy-Foot-Diameter Annular Parachute With 24-Foot-Diameter Engagement Parachute in Midair Retrieval Configuration..jpg 396 × 467; 25 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-6. Seventy-Foot-Diameter Annular Parachute With 24-Foot-Diameter Engagement Parachute in Midair Retrieval Configuration.2.jpg 617 × 760; 227 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-60. Parachute Opening Forces as a Function of Altitude for Various Types of Parachutes..jpg 542 × 502; 44 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-61. 15.6-Foot-Diameter Ringslot B-47 Approach Parachute Opening Forces as a Function of Altitude..jpg 723 × 459; 57 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-62. Effect of Canopy Porosity on Drag Coefficient for Various Parachutes..jpg 569 × 496; 53 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-63. Drag Coefficient and Oscillation as a Function of Total Porosity for 3.5-Foot-Diameter Flat and Conical Ribbon Parachutes as Measured in Wind-Tunnel Tests..jpg 647 × 421; 35 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-64. Opening-Force Coefficient as a Function of Total Porosity..jpg 745 × 461; 39 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-65. Opening-Force Coefficient as a Function of Cloth Permeability for Cross Parachutes as Measured by the Naval Surface Warfare Center..jpg 585 × 317; 29 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-66. Parachute Skirt Reefing..jpg 764 × 570; 46 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-67. Parachute Skirt Reefing With Control Line..jpg 740 × 532; 52 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-69. Total Parachute Force, Suspension-Line Force, and Vent-Line Force, as Functions of Vent-Line Retraction..jpg 455 × 330; 33 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-7. Cross Parachute in Wind-Tunnel Test..jpg 329 × 312; 8 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-7. Cross Parachute in Wind-Tunnel Test.2.jpg 476 × 495; 105 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-70. Slider Reefing..jpg 469 × 313; 62 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-71. Reefing Ratio Versus Reefing-Line Ratio for Various Parachutes..jpg 498 × 636; 48 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-72. Reefing Ratio Versus Reefing-Line Ratio for Circular Flat, Conical, Triconical, and Extrended-Skirt Parachutes..jpg 672 × 732; 62 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-73. Reefing Ratio Versus Reefing-Line Ratio for 13.4-Foot-Diameter Conical Ribbon Parachute Tested in Aircraft Tow Test..jpg 498 × 730; 47 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-74. Force Relationship in a Reefed Parachute..jpg 305 × 530; 17 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-75. Reefed Canopy Profiles for Two Parachute Canopies of 0% and 20% Porosity..jpg 373 × 252; 25 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-76. Ratio of Reefing-Line Force to Maximum Reefed Parachute Force Versus Reefing-Line Ratio..jpg 490 × 547; 47 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-77. Definition of Inflated Canopy Dimensons..jpg 383 × 495; 24 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-78. Canopy-Skirt Diameter as a Function of the Number of Gores for a Ribbon Parachute With Dp = 0.67 Do..jpg 636 × 278; 26 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-79. Canopy Cross Section of Two Ribbon Parachutes..jpg 620 × 470; 42 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-8. Thirty-Two-Foot-Diameter Ribbon, Landing Deceleration Parachute..jpg 680 × 403; 58 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-8. Thirty-Two-Foot-Diameter Ribbon, Landing Deceleration Parachute.2.jpg 1,067 × 643; 330 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-80. Side Profiles of Ribbon Parachute Canopies With Porosities From 15 to 30%..jpg 361 × 229; 26 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-81. Side Profiles of a Ribbon Parachute With Constant Canopy Porosity and Suspension-Line Ratios of 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0..jpg 366 × 275; 26 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-82. Airflow and Pressure Distribution Around a Parachute Canopy..jpg 506 × 259; 19 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-83. External Pressure Coefficient Versus Mach Number for a Ribbon-Type Metal Hemisphere..jpg 689 × 464; 60 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-84. Inside, Outside, and Total Pressure Distribution Versus Mach Number for a Ribbon-Type Metal Hemisphere, Measured in Wind-Tunnel Tests..jpg 675 × 579; 66 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-85. Pressure Distribution of a Ribbon Parachute at Varius Times After Canopy Deployment..jpg 788 × 847; 105 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-86. Supersonic Flow Around a Bullet-Type-Body..jpg 728 × 331; 26 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-87. Drag Coefficient. CD, Versus Mach Number for an Ejectable Aircraft Nose Section..jpg 876 × 484; 29 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-88. Supersonic Flow Field Around a Parachute Canopy..jpg 644 × 345; 25 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-89. Supersonic Flow Around a Vehicle-Parachute System..jpg 861 × 313; 45 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-9. Ringslot Parachute..jpg 624 × 301; 54 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-9. Ringslot Parachute.2.jpg 1,022 × 485; 242 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-90. Configurations of Three Supersonic Ribbon Parachutes..jpg 708 × 675; 49 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-91. Drag Coefficient of Several Ribbon Parachutes as a Function of Mach Number (1962 Data)..jpg 743 × 408; 51 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-92. Demonstrated Mach Number-Altitude Range of Conical Ribbon Parachutes..jpg 453 × 673; 45 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-93. Drag Coefficient Versus Mach Number for Conical Ribbon Parachutes..jpg 337 × 582; 49 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-94. Demonstrated Altitude Versus Mach-Number Range of Hemisflo Ribbon Parachutes..jpg 529 × 743; 49 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-95. Drag Coefficient Versus Mach Number for Hemisflo Ribbon Parachute..jpg 507 × 601; 52 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-96. Drag Coefficient Versus Mach Number for Conical Ribbon and Hemisflo Parachutes (Recommended for Computerized Analysis of These Parachutes)..jpg 736 × 513; 45 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-97. Ballute-Type Inflatable Decelerator..jpg 490 × 298; 22 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-98. Drag Coefficient, CDO, Versus Mach Number for Goodyear Ballute..jpg 729 × 415; 33 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 5-99. Force-Versus-Time Comparison Between a 5.5-Foot-Diameter Parasonic Parachute and a 3-Foot-Diameter Ballute Tested at Mach 2.6..jpg 741 × 656; 81 KB
  
• 
  FIGURE 7-1. Reconnaissance-Drone and Air Bag Configurations..jpg 541 × 582; 44 KB